Category: Uncategorized

8.1.13 / THE PSUEDO-SCIENCE OF ADVERTS | Via “The Daily Heller @ Print Magazine

8.1.13 / THE PSUEDO-SCIENCE OF ADVERTS

 

Anyone who says that the mid-1950s Creative Revolution (The Big Idea epoch)  was merely a semantic change in the way advertising was practiced, should look below. Try to find the creative in this primer of persuasion.

The advertising industry, which Edward Bernays suggested was the propaganda ministry of the nation, sought whatever scientific means it could to guarantee success. Capitalism runs on commerce, so psychology, as Aldous Huxley has written, was employed early in the 20th century and adopted for better or worse in the postwar era.

adverts 10

Freud was the Mad Men’s best friend.

What everyone wants and advertising must exploit.

What everyone wants and advertising must exploit.

More fundamental wants and desires.

More fundamental wants and desires.

Advertising is a science?

Advertising is a science?

What's that in his hands, rope and bat? Hmmmmm.

What’s that in his hands, rope and bat? Hmmmmm.

Aspiration, inspiration, perspiration.

Aspiration, inspiration, perspiration.

Women: Consumer and allurer. . .

Women: Consumer and allurer. . .

Beats me . . . !!!

Beats me . . . !!!

Truth. You want the truth, I'll give you the truth!

Truth. You want the truth?! You can’t handle the truth!!!

Let's review. Got it? Got it!

Let’s review. Got it? Got it!

http://www.printmag.com/imprint/the-psuedo-science-of-adverts/

Es retirada campaña multimillonaria de Coca-Cola | http://www.elpoderdelconsumidor.org

Es retirada campaña multimillonaria de Coca-Cola

Vía: El poder del consumidor.

“Conocer y reconocer la opinión y puntos de vista nos hace mejores, más críticos, con mayor poder de decisión. FHR”

• La campaña publicitaria “149 calorías” de Coca-Cola es de las más grandes que ha sido retirada y sancionada por autoridad en México.
• Esta campaña también fue retirada por la autoridad británica a raíz de las protestas presentadas por los consumidores.
• El envase del refresco de 600 ml. con el cual se confunde a la población contiene 252 calorías, significativamente más que las 149 calorías contenidas en un envase de 355 ml.
• La ingesta extra de calorías representa un riesgo para el 40% de la población mexicana que estando en su peso ya presenta síndrome metabólico y pone en riesgo aún mayor al 14% de los adultos que sufren diabetes.

22 julio 2013. La campaña de Coca-Cola “149 calorías” presente en miles de espectaculares distribuidos en todo el país, en spots de radio y televisión, en impresos e internet, ha sido retirada y sancionada por Cofepris y Profeco por engañosa y representar un riesgo para la salud.

La empresa Coca-Cola, que tiene sus mayores ventas en el mundo en México, se vio obligada, así, a retirar miles de espectaculares en todo el país, sus spots en los medios electrónicos, sus anuncios en medios impresos y en internet.

El 19 de junio de 2013, El Poder del Consumidor presentó ante la Procuraduría Federal del Consumidor (Profeco) una denuncia contra la campaña de Coca-Cola “149 calorías” por engañosa, a lo que la autoridad respondió que se integraba a un expediente ya abierto contra esa publicidad (PFC.B.B. 13/000039/2013).

Del mismo modo, al día siguiente, El Poder del Consumidor presentó una denuncia contra esa publicidad por representar un riesgo para la salud ante la Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios (Cofepris).

La campaña multimillonaria de Coca-Cola, extendida por todo el territorio nacional y a través de muy diversos medios, publicitaba su bebida principal con las leyendas “149 calorías de felicidad”, “149 calorías para disfrutar”; acompañada con las frases “disfrutando 22 minutos en bicicleta”, “20 minutos para bailar con los amigos”, “para usar en más actividades felices”.

La denuncia se centró en señalar el riesgo a la salud que significa la promoción de un mayor consumo de calorías gastándola a través de la realización de diversas actividades físicas, considerando que se dirige a una población que en su gran mayoría (70% de los adultos y más de 30% de niños y niñas) presenta ya un consumo excesivo de calorías y un gran déficit de actividad física.

“El consumo de calorías extras significa incrementar los riesgos en salud para la mayoría de la población mexicana, complicar su tratamiento y aumentar el gasto familiar y público en salud. La ingesta extra de calorías agudiza los problemas de sobrepeso u obesidad que afectan a la mayor parte de la población mexicana, representa un riesgo para el 40% de la población que estando en su peso ya presenta síndrome metabólico y pone en riesgo aún mayor al 14% de los adultos que se considera sufren diabetes” señaló Xaviera Cabada, nuestra coordinadora de Salud Alimentaria en El Poder del Consumidor.

Katia García, investigadora en Salud Alimentaria de El Poder del Consumidor declaró que “entre otro de los elementos presentados en la denuncia destaca el análisis de las imágenes y su relación con el mensaje de esta publicidad. La empresa usa un envase de cristal de 355 mililitros muy poco consumido en nuestro país para confundir a los consumidores, por su tamaño, haciéndoles pensar que se trata de un envase de 600 mililitros, el más consumido en México. En letras muy pequeñas establece que dichas calorías aplican para un refresco de 355 mililitros o una lata. El envase del refresco de 600 mililitros con el cual se confunde a la población contiene 252 calorías, significativamente más que las 149 calorías contenidas en un envase de 355 mililitros. Esto se constituye en publicidad engañosa”.

Por su parte, Alejandro Calvillo, nuestro director de El Poder del Consumidor, señaló que “como denunciantes hemos solicitado a Cofepris y a Profeco conocer las resoluciones del caso, pero se nos ha informado que los expedientes todavía no se han cerrado y, por lo tanto, no podemos tener acceso a conocer la resoluciones y cuáles fueron las consideraciones de la autoridad para retirar y multar a Coca-Cola por esta campaña, que representa, sin duda, la campaña publicitaria de mayor inversión que ha sido retirada por la autoridad en la historia del país. México es el mayor consumidor de refrescos en el mundo y de Coca-Cola en particular. El consumo regular de esta bebida está asociado al riesgo de desarrollar obesidad, síndrome metabólico y diabetes”, concluyó.

La campaña de Coca-Cola ha sido también retirada en el Reino Unido por tratarse de una publicidad engañosa que representa un riesgo a la salud. “Es importante lo que está pasando a escala internacional, tenemos la necesidad deponer un alto al engaño de la publicidad, al engaño de las etiquetas que han sumido a los consumidores en la ignorancia y que han llevado a esta epidemia de sobrepeso y obesidad. El caso más extremo lo representa las campañas de Coca-Cola que asocian su consumo a la felicidad, cuando este tipo de productos tienen una responsabilidad en la epidemia global de sobrepeso, obesidad y diabetes”, agregó Calvillo.

El Poder del Consumidor denunció públicamente que Coca-Cola está violando aún la resolución de la autoridad manteniendo esta publicidad en algunos espacios, como en el segundo piso del Periférico en dirección sur-norte, en el entronque con Viaducto, donde aún se encuentra un espectacular con esta campaña.

http://www.elpoderdelconsumidor.org/saludnutricional/es-retirada-y-sancionada-campana-multimillonaria-de-coca-cola/

Research: How Sensory Information Influences Price Decisions | HBR Blog Network

by Steve W. Martin  |  11:00 AM July 26, 2013

The conversations salespeople have with prospective customers involve these visual, auditory, and kinesthetic channels. Can different amounts of visual, auditory and kinesthetic information influence the price customers will pay for an item? Recently, a sales linguistics experiment was conducted in order to answer this question. Sales Linguistics is the study of how customers and salespeople use language during the complex decision-making process.

Sensory Information Price Test

Study participants were separated into three groups and six items were presented to them in a classroom setting. All participants were business professionals and university graduates between the age of twenty-four and fifty-seven. The groups were asked to estimate the price of each item and rank whether they had a low, medium, or high level of comfort with the answer they gave.

The first group would be presented only visual information consisting of a picture of the item and a brief description. The second group would be shown the same visual information as the first group, but the description would be read to them with dramatic emphasis and accentuation, creating an auditory connection. The third group would be shown the visual information, read the description in the same manner as for group two, and also be provided the opportunity to hold and inspect the item before making their guess, creating a kinetic bond..

The participants were presented with an eclectic mix of items. In order, they were shown a baseball hit by famous home run hitter Manny Ramirez of the Cleveland Indians, a six inch wooden penguin honoring Admiral Byrd’s expedition to the south pole, a black plastic stapler, a copy of Rudyard Kipling’s second Jungle Book published in 1915, a vintage brass letter opener from Italy, and a 1886 Morgan United States Silver Dollar.

Understanding the Test Results

While the test results provide many different revelations about how people interpret information, two high-level metrics underscore the impact sight, sound, and touch can have when making a decision about price. Below are the average answer comfort scores for each group (with three being the highest score). You’ll notice the scores increase with the addition of more sensory information by approximately 20 percent. The third group who received the highest amount of information from all three sensory channels had the highest sense of comfort with their answers.

Comfort Scores Chart

The next point of comparison is average total overall price, which is calculated by adding the estimated price together for each of the six items. The average total overall price for each group varied greatly with group two (visual and auditory information) being the highest at $325,000. In addition, 29% of group two members estimated all the items cost over $250,000 whereas none did in group three. 

Overall Price

Clearly, the test results show that different amounts of visual, auditory and kinesthetic information influence the perception of the item’s price. The experiment also provides other important lessons for sales and marketing professionals.

Customer Miscommunication

The mind does not treat all information equally. Information is ignored, misinterpreted, and generalized based upon surrounding experiences. For example, study participants misinterpreted that the baseball hit by Manny Ramirez was a home run ball when it was only a foul ball. You should never assume prospective customers have received the message correctly.

Verbal Suggestion Susceptibility

The mind is quite susceptible to verbal suggestions. Group two’s average total price was nearly seven times that of group one and close to twenty times the average of group three. The tone, tempo and demeanor of what you say can have more impact on a prospective customer than the actual words you speak. This is a particularly important point for salespeople who sell primarily over the phone.

E-mail Communication Dependency

Salespeople have increasingly grown to rely on e-mail for their primary method of communication with prospective and existing customers. There is a down side to this dependence since the persuasiveness of verbal suggestions is forfeited. Check your sent box and examine the last twenty e-mails you sent. Where would a phone call or in-person conversation have been better suited?

Avoid Product Evaluations

No salesperson typically wants to slow down the sales cycle by having the customer conduct a lengthy product evaluation. This study provides an entirely new reason why they should be avoided. The results suggest that hands-on familiarity with an item actually lowers the perception of its value. For example, the average price for group three who handled the brass letter opener was $100 while group two’s average was nearly $10,000.

Sales Presentation “Talk Track”

The “talk track” that accompanies sales presentations and product demonstrations plays a critical role in shaping the prospective customer’s perception of value. In this regard, many companies don’t take the time to ensure the fluency of their sales organizations by providing them compelling written scripts and testing them to ensure they are able to delivered persuasively.

it was Rudyard Kipling who said “Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind.” He was right. Your most important competitive weapon is your mouth and the words you speak. This test proves it’s not only what you say, but also how you say it! 

More blog posts by Steve W. Martin
More on: Sales

Use Sales Linguistics to Structure Winning Presentations | HBR Blog Network

There’s an exciting new area of study called “sales linguistics” that provides key strategies on how to structure language-based interactions that turn skeptics into believers. The goal of sales linguistics is to understand how salespeople and their prospective customers use and interpret language during the meetings and presentations.

From a sales linguistic perspective, every interaction has three stages, and each stage requires different linguistic strategies. The opening stage comprises the few minutes at the beginning of the talk, the main stage is the longest period of interaction where the main messages are delivered, and the closing stage is the time at the end of the speech. For example, if you were making a 30 minute presentation, the opening stage would be about seven minutes, the main stage would be seventeen minutes, and the closing stage six minutes.

Your personal demeanor should vary at each stage, moving from approachability (not overfriendliness or too formal) in the opening to confidence when talking in the main stage. At the close, you want to establish “situational dominance.” Most people mistakenly equate this term negatively to the use of brute force to overwhelm someone. Conversely, situational dominance is when the listener chooses to accept and internalize your words so they follow your advice.

The goal of the first stage is to establish a behavior interruption. Put yourself in the position of the listener for a moment. You’ve sat through thousands of different presentations, and you probably have a lot of other things on your mind. Therefore, the first step should be to perform a behavior interruption to break the listener’s mode of thinking and stand out from previous memories.

The behavior interruption starts the process of building rapport, engages interest, and provokes open-mindedness. It successfully sets the stage for the remainder of the speech. But what exactly is a behavior interruption? Let me explain with the following analogy. An Apple iPod can store thousands of songs. We have several iPods in my household, and I frequently listen to my daughter’s to check out the latest hits. As I thumb through her playlists, each song has just a few seconds to capture my attention. If the introduction isn’t interesting, different, or exciting, I immediately move on to the next song.

Do not equate a behavior interruption to simply telling a joke or funny story at the beginning of your presentation. A behavior interruption is pre-meditated language structure. For example, I worked at a company whose core technology was originally developed by the California Institute of Technology and funded by a grant from NASA. Explaining the origins of the company during presentations — not with one simple slide with a few bullet points, but using highlights of the project and its successful results set against the black backdrop of the space shuttle in outer space — was a great behavior interruption.

You should consider this fact when structuring the main section of your presentation. The average person will hear only seven and a half minutes of a one-hour presentation and remember only half of the words he or she hears. In essence, we don’t listen and our conscious mind rejects far more words than we actually hear. However, the subconscious mind acts as a reservoir for this overflow of information.

One sales linguistic persuasion technique that can be used to present information is the metaphor. Metaphors are stories, parables, and analogies that communicate ideas by using examples that people can relate to and identify with. Metaphors enable complex concepts and theories to be explained in an understandable, interesting, and persuasive manner. Using metaphors is a nonthreatening way to present your point of view, facts, and directions you would like your audience to follow.

The power of metaphors lies in their individual interpretation. While the conscious mind is listening to the content of the surface-level story, the subconscious mind is deciphering its own message. For example, every cigarette package contains a factual warning from the surgeon general that smoking causes cancer. However, I highly doubt these warnings are actually preventing people from smoking. Rather, I believe the personal stories you see on television told by previous smokers about their tremendous health problems are far more influential.

The language structures to be employed during the closing section should include commands and presenting foreground and background suggestions. A command is an instructional statement that creates a binary type of yes or no response from the recipient. It is typically associated with a hard close and “take it or leave it” mentality. Foreground suggestions (medium close) are explicit, but they deflect the source of the request from the demander. Background suggestions (soft close) lead recipients to believe they are acting of their free will when in fact they have been directed to follow a message.

Let’s pretend I am a passenger in your car and I feel you are driving too fast. A command would be “Slow down!” A foreground suggestion would be “You know the speed limit is 45 mph and police ticket a lot of speeders here.” A background suggestion would be “A speeder was in a horrible accident last week in this exact spot.” While the background suggestion may be more subtle in its delivery, it can trigger a more profound reaction.

Every presentation is based upon the complex process of communication consisting of verbal and nonverbal messages that the listener receives consciously and subconsciously. However, since we are talking all the time we tend to take the process for granted. Persuasion is not about getting others to acknowledge your arguments; it’s about making them internalize your message because they believe that it is in their best interests. Ultimately, persuasion is the ability to tap into someone’s emotions and reach the deeper subconscious decision maker within that person.

More blog posts by Steve W. Martin
More on: Sales

I’m dedicated to amplify strengths instead of repairing weaknesses.

I’m dedicated to amplify strengths instead of repairing weaknesses. I do it with perseverance/grit, self control, willingness, social intelligence, immense gratitude and optimism.

With my partners I have developed a space that recognizes the importance of differences and team working, conceived to define challenges, choice creation, idea life ability and making happen possibilities.

I do and act with in this principles for companies and organizations, some times for products and brands, but Always always, I do it among friends.

_______________________________

Me dedico a amplificar las fortalezas en lugar de señalar las debilidades. Lo hago con perseverancia, auto control, mucho entusiasmo, con inteligencia social, inmensa gratitud y optimismo.

Junto con mis socios he creado un espacio de trabajo que reconoce las diferencias y la importancia del equipo; éste lugar está concebido para definir retos, crear opciones y dar vida a ideas y hacer crecer las posibilidades.

Lo que hago a veces es para empresas y organizaciones, otras son servicios, productos y marcas, pero siempre siempre es con amigos.

http://www.linkedin.com/in/federicohernandez

7 Of The Biggest Lies In Graphic Design. Via fastcodesign.com

7 Of The Biggest Lies In Graphic Design

IN CRAIG WARD’S “POPULAR LIES ABOUT GRAPHIC DESIGN,” SOME OF THE MOST FAMOUS PRACTITIONERS AROUND DEBUNK THE GREATEST MISCONCEPTIONS PLAGUING THE PROFESSION.

Even if you don’t know much about graphic design, you can probably throw out a few cocktail-party-worthy truisms: “Comic Sans is just the worst typeface ever.” That statement is irrefutable, right? As unassailable as grass being green, Shakespeare was a genius, and Tina Fey is way funnier than Seth MacFarlane. If you want to come off as a typography dilettante, you might make some seemingly inoffensive remark like, “Well, you can’t go wrong with Helvetica.” And if Craig Ward overheard you, he’d most likely shudder and take a subtle step toward the door. It’s hackneyed statements like these that he tries to dismantle in his pocket-size Popular Lies About Graphic Design.

According to Ward, a New York–based British designer, Comic Sans “is the typographic equivalent of an innocent man on death row.” Sure, it’s ugly, he admits, but there are plenty of other bad handwriting fonts that don’t stir up nearly as much unfair bile and vitriol. And as far as Helvetica goes, it’s hardly the typographic corollary of the perfect black dress, suitable for any occasion. It may be “as ubiquitous a typeface as has ever existed,” but don’t mistake ubiquity for neutrality; Helvetica, in fact, is an “authoritative typeface with a distinct tone of voice.” If you’re looking for vanilla, you’d be well advised to look around for another font.

Don’t feel bad if you’ve adopted some arguments Ward might find specious; even professional designers lean on well-worn rules and generalities to help create guidelines, and others will argue against them. You, like Mies van der Rohe and Dieter Rams, may subscribe to the philosophy of “less is more.” In Popular Lies, Milton Glaser says that maxim is patently false. Ward says that the book is meant to encourage designers to experiment, “examining other possibilities when it may be easier to side with something tried and tested.”

Here are a some of the choice gems, from Ward and some of his famous-designer friends in response to the question: What’s the biggest lie you’ve ever been told about design?

 

1. LONGER DEADLINES WILL LEAD TO BETTER WORK.

Craig Ward

 

My experience may be unique. But for my money, you rarely need more than a few weeks for most still image projects. Obviously, if you’re attempting something more ambitious, or time related, then you may need longer, but, really, three or four rounds of amends over the course of a couple of weeks is usually ample. Much more and you can end up wasting your time chasing unworkable ideas or losing focus, much less and you may feel under too much pressure to deliver and that, in itself can be equally stifling.

2. THERE’S NO BUDGET, BUT IT’S A GREAT OPPORTUNITY.

–Craig Ward

And that would be an opportunity for what exactly?

If you go your entire career without receiving this kind of a proposition, you’re doing either extremely well or extremely badly depending on your mindset. The idea that it’s okay for you to spend days of your time creating work for world-renowned clients who aren’t paying you a decent wage is pretty shameful–yet often unavoidable. Unless you set your stall out very early on and stick to your guns.

 

3. YOU CAN’T JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER.

David Carson

 

If the designer has done their job, you should absolutely be able to do this.

 

4. THE COMPUTER IS JUST A TOOL.

Stefan Sagmeister

 

It is not. You are the tool.

 

5. STAY SMALL.

–Willy Wong

 

“Stay small” was a piece of advice I heard quite often when I began my career. Smaller studios and a small circle of clients–I was told–meant more control and thus (work of a) higher quality. In fact, go solo if you could.

Nowadays, I find that nothing happens in a silo and that everything is connected. If you’ve got sharp kerning skills, good intentions, and the ingenuity to spin gold out of thin air, why not add solid management skills to your belt and be able to kill it at scale? The world seems to need designers more than ever. What’s wrong with being part of a group, playing in a team, forming a league, building a community. Not everyone has the capacity to manage process, budgets, expectations, or personalities, but if you got ‘em, why not go for it? Balls out!

 

6. “WE DON’T HAVE ANY MONEY.”

Craig Redman

 

It’s that whole tiresome act of the client pleading poor and screwing you down to the dollar. Then you find out later they paid a million bucks for some other component of the project.

 

7. PEOPLE WILL WANT TO BUY YOUR PIN, BADGES, AND T-SHIRT.

–Craig Ward

 

They probably won’t. Sorry.

Remember that even these so-called lies should be taken with a grain of salt; design is subjective, and you’re entitled to your own bloody opinions. As Ward writes in his introduction, “This is not a book full of facts. Nor is it a book full of advice. It’s a book full of opinions, and confusion between those three is how a lot of these problems begin.” In other words, don’t feel you need to take other people’s espoused opinions as facts.

Buy the book here for $11.

BELINDA LANKS

Belinda Lanks is the deputy editor of Co.Design. Before joining FastCompany.com, she was the managing editor of Metropolis. Her writing has appeared in The … 

7 Of The Biggest Lies In Graphic Design. Via FastCo.

7 Of The Biggest Lies In Graphic Design IN CRAIG WARD’S “POPULAR LIES ABOUT GRAPHIC DESIGN,” SOME OF THE MOST FAMOUS PRACTITIONERS AROUND DEBUNK THE GREATEST MISCONCEPTIONS PLAGUING THE PROFESSION. 8 Comments inShare Even if you don’t know much about graphic design, you can probably throw out a few cocktail-party-worthy truisms: “Comic Sans is just the worst typeface ever.” That statement is irrefutable, right? As unassailable as grass being green, Shakespeare was a genius, and Tina Fey is way funnier than Seth MacFarlane. If you want to come off as a typography dilettante, you might make some seemingly inoffensive remark like, “Well, you can’t go wrong with Helvetica.” And if Craig Ward overheard you, he’d most likely shudder and take a subtle step toward the door. It’s hackneyed statements like these that he tries to dismantle in his pocket-size Popular Lies About Graphic Design. According to Ward, a New York–based British designer, Comic Sans “is the typographic equivalent of an innocent man on death row.” Sure, it’s ugly, he admits, but there are plenty of other bad handwriting fonts that don’t stir up nearly as much unfair bile and vitriol. And as far as Helvetica goes, it’s hardly the typographic corollary of the perfect black dress, suitable for any occasion. It may be “as ubiquitous a typeface as has ever existed,” but don’t mistake ubiquity for neutrality; Helvetica, in fact, is an “authoritative typeface with a distinct tone of voice.” If you’re looking for vanilla, you’d be well advised to look around for another font. Don’t feel bad if you’ve adopted some arguments Ward might find specious; even professional designers lean on well-worn rules and generalities to help create guidelines, and others will argue against them. You, like Mies van der Rohe and Dieter Rams, may subscribe to the philosophy of “less is more.” In Popular Lies, Milton Glaser says that maxim is patently false. Ward says that the book is meant to encourage designers to experiment, “examining other possibilities when it may be easier to side with something tried and tested.” Here are a some of the choice gems, from Ward and some of his famous-designer friends in response to the question: What’s the biggest lie you’ve ever been told about design? 1. LONGER DEADLINES WILL LEAD TO BETTER WORK. –Craig Ward My experience may be unique. But for my money, you rarely need more than a few weeks for most still image projects. Obviously, if you’re attempting something more ambitious, or time related, then you may need longer, but, really, three or four rounds of amends over the course of a couple of weeks is usually ample. Much more and you can end up wasting your time chasing unworkable ideas or losing focus, much less and you may feel under too much pressure to deliver and that, in itself can be equally stifling. 2. THERE’S NO BUDGET, BUT IT’S A GREAT OPPORTUNITY. –Craig Ward And that would be an opportunity for what exactly? If you go your entire career without receiving this kind of a proposition, you’re doing either extremely well or extremely badly depending on your mindset. The idea that it’s okay for you to spend days of your time creating work for world-renowned clients who aren’t paying you a decent wage is pretty shameful–yet often unavoidable. Unless you set your stall out very early on and stick to your guns. 3. YOU CAN’T JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER. –David Carson If the designer has done their job, you should absolutely be able to do this. 4. THE COMPUTER IS JUST A TOOL. –Stefan Sagmeister It is not. You are the tool. 5. STAY SMALL. –Willy Wong “Stay small” was a piece of advice I heard quite often when I began my career. Smaller studios and a small circle of clients–I was told–meant more control and thus (work of a) higher quality. In fact, go solo if you could. Nowadays, I find that nothing happens in a silo and that everything is connected. If you’ve got sharp kerning skills, good intentions, and the ingenuity to spin gold out of thin air, why not add solid management skills to your belt and be able to kill it at scale? The world seems to need designers more than ever. What’s wrong with being part of a group, playing in a team, forming a league, building a community. Not everyone has the capacity to manage process, budgets, expectations, or personalities, but if you got ‘em, why not go for it? Balls out! 6. “WE DON’T HAVE ANY MONEY.” –Craig Redman It’s that whole tiresome act of the client pleading poor and screwing you down to the dollar. Then you find out later they paid a million bucks for some other component of the project. 7. PEOPLE WILL WANT TO BUY YOUR PIN, BADGES, AND T-SHIRT. –Craig Ward They probably won’t. Sorry. Remember that even these so-called lies should be taken with a grain of salt; design is subjective, and you’re entitled to your own bloody opinions. As Ward writes in his introduction, “This is not a book full of facts. Nor is it a book full of advice. It’s a book full of opinions, and confusion between those three is how a lot of these problems begin.” In other words, don’t feel you need to take other people’s espoused opinions as facts. Buy the book here for $11. BELINDA LANKS Belinda Lanks is the deputy editor of Co.Design. Before joining FastCompany.com, she was the managing editor of Metropolis. Her writing has appeared in The … CONTINUED

The Lean LaunchPad Goes to High School by steveblank

Failure and Redemption by steveblank

OPPENHEIMER: México está de moda, salvo en México. Vía: ELNUEVOHERALD.com

Publicado el sábado, 03.02.13 EL INFORME OPPENHEIMER OPPENHEIMER: México está de moda, salvo en México “OPPENHEIMER PRESENTA” No se pierdan el programa “Oppenheimer Presenta”, todos los domingos a las 9 p.m. en CNN en Español. ANDRÉS OPPENHEIMER AOPPENHEIMER@ELNUEVOHERALD.COM CIUDAD DE MEXICO – Durante una visita a México la semana pasada, me sorprendió la sonrisa escéptica con que muchos mexicanos reaccionan ante los artículos que están saliendo en la prensa internacional vaticinando que México será la próxima estrella de la economía global, y que ya ha llegado “el momento de México”. Durante las últimas semanas han salido una serie de artículos en algunos de los principales medios internacionales anunciando que México eclipsará a Brasil, y tal vez a India y China, como la nueva potencia del mundo emergente. La semana pasada, la prestigiosa revista Foreign Affairs publicó un articulo de portada bajo el título de “México Triunfa”. Poco antes, el 26 de enero, el New York Times había publicado un artículo de opinión titulado: “México: la nueva China”. El Financial Times de Gran Bretaña, publicó un extenso artículo en enero titulado: “México: el Tigre Azteca”. A fines del año pasado, la revista británica The Economist había publicado un artículo titulado “El ascenso de México”, y yo había hecho mi humilde contribución a este coro de optimismo con una columna del Miami Herald titulada: “México con viento a favor”. Hasta hace pocos meses, casi todos los medios internacionales habían estado publicando titulares escalofriantes sobre la violencia en México, y sobre los 60,000 muertos en la guerra contra las drogas de los últimos seis años. ¿Cómo se explica este súbito cambio en la imagen de México? Quizás México sea el nuevo niño mimado de la prensa internacional no tanto por mérito propio, sino porque Brasil, China e India están creciendo más lentamente. La economía mexicana creció 4 por ciento el año pasado, mientras que la de Brasil creció el 1 por ciento. Además, los periodistas muchas veces somos como pájaros sentados sobre un cable telefónico: una vez que uno levanta vuelo, todos levantan vuelo. En mi visita a México, encontré un escepticismo generalizado sobre el enamoramiento de la prensa internacional por México. “Después de tantos años de un crecimiento económico mediocre, sigue habiendo un sentimiento de frustración”, me dijo el encuestador Ulises Beltrán, director de la encuestadora BCG. Según la última encuesta de Beltrán, sólo el 46 por ciento de los mexicanos cree que los próximos cinco años serán mejores, comparado con el 56 por ciento a principios del 2006. La confianza de la gente ha crecido un poco desde que el presidente Enrique Peña Nieto asumió la presidencia en diciembre, pero el 66 por ciento dice que la situación económica de México es “regular” o “mala”. Durante un panel en el que participé en Ciudad de México la semana pasada, cuando le pregunté a un público de alrededor de 500 personas si eran optimistas con respecto al futuro de México, sólo la mitad de la gente levantó la mano. Y casi todos los analistas políticos reaccionan con una mezcla de cautela y humor a los pronósticos optimistas del extranjero. Comentando sobre el titular del “México: Tigre Azteca” del Financial Times, el columnista Sergio Sarmiento, del diario Reforma, escribió que “en el campo de la metáfora, no podemos olvidar que el tigre es un animal que no existe en nuestro país. Quizás por ello nunca podremos ser un tigre azteca”. Mi opinión: México no es una “nueva China” ni un “Tigre” de la economía mundial, al menos todavía no. Pero no hay duda de que hay una constelación de factores positivos que actúan a su favor, como no hemos visto en décadas. La recuperación económica de Estados Unidos ayudará a las exportaciones de México; la probable reforma inmigratoria estadounidense legalizara a millones de mexicanos que conseguirán empleos mejor pagos y enviarán miles de millones de dólares adicionales a sus familiares en México, y el alza de los salarios en China ya está haciendo que cada vez más empresas multinacionales se muden de China a México. Igualmente importante, un pacto político firmado el 2 de diciembre entre los tres principales partidos políticos de México podría materializar las muy postergadas reformas educativa, energética y de telecomunicaciones que tanto necesita el país. La aprobación, la semana pasada, de una enmienda constitucional que permitiría la evaluación de los maestros, junto con el muy publicitado arresto de la todopoderosa líder del sindicato de maestros Elba Esther Gordillo, podrían indicar que Peña Nieto está seriamente decidido a impulsar estas reformas. Pero para que “El ascenso de México” se convierta en realidad, los mexicanos tendrán que empezar a creerlo ellos mismos. Hasta hora, Peña Nieto ha hecho un buen trabajo de convencer a los extranjeros de que México está en ascenso, pero ahora tendrá que hacer lo mismo en casa, para que la autoestima de los mexicanos crezca, tal como ha ocurrido en Perú y Colombia en los últimos años. Si los mexicanos no están convencidos, “el momento de México” no durará demasiado. Read more here: http://www.elnuevoherald.com/2013/03/02/1421122_p2/mexico-esta-de-moda-salvo-…